The Final Photos of Marilyn Monroe: A Legal Battle Over Missing Negatives
The mysterious disappearance of thousands of original negatives from the iconic photographer Bert Stern's final shoot with Marilyn Monroe has sparked a legal battle. Stern's widow, Shannah Laumeister Stern, claims the negatives were stolen years ago and are now the subject of a lawsuit to prevent their sale at auction. This story delves into the complex web of events surrounding the missing photos and the emotional impact on those involved.
The Last Sitting: A Historic Shoot
In 1962, Bert Stern was commissioned by Vogue to capture Marilyn Monroe's final photo shoot, a historic moment that produced over 2,500 images. Known as 'The Last Sitting,' these photos became iconic, with Stern's work immortalizing Monroe in her final weeks. The images, including contact sheets with Monroe's own annotations, were later published in a book, offering a glimpse into her final days.
The Disappearance
According to Shannah Laumeister Stern, the negatives vanished from Bert Stern's apartment in the middle of the night before his death in 2013. She believes the Mafia was involved, a theory fueled by anonymous messages Stern received over the years. The lack of evidence for a loan, as claimed by 'Jane Doe,' adds to the mystery, with the attorney's changing stories about the negatives' recovery raising suspicions.
Legal Battle and Emotional Impact
Shannah's lawsuit seeks to halt the sale of the photos at Heritage Auctions, arguing for the protection of Bert Stern's legacy. She expresses deep disrespect and a sense of being taken advantage of, emphasizing the importance of the negatives' return to the Bert Stern Trust. The case highlights the emotional and legal complexities surrounding the loss of historical artifacts, inviting discussion on the ethical responsibilities of auction houses and collectors.
A Controversial Turn
The legal battle takes a turn as Richard Aulisi, representing 'Jane Doe,' denies the allegations, promising a fight. The auction house's spokesperson stands by the consigner's warranty, adding fuel to the controversy. This case echoes a similar dispute involving legendary war photographer Al Rockoff, whose negatives were allegedly taken without consent, raising questions about the protection of historical photographic materials.
