A former school board president's decision to stay on as an active member has sparked controversy and raised questions among the community.
Terri Lawson, the former president of the Woodland Hills School Board, has stepped down from her leadership position after facing criminal charges related to her previous role as Rankin's borough manager. Despite calls for her complete resignation, Lawson intends to remain an active board member.
On Wednesday night, board officials unanimously voted to accept Lawson's resignation as president. Karen Lyons was elected as the new president, and Cynthia Wallace as the vice president. However, board member Darnika Reed expressed a strong opinion, stating that Lawson should resign entirely from her board membership.
The charges against Lawson allege financial misconduct, claiming she misused a Rankin Borough credit card and owed the borough thousands of dollars. Lawson's attorney, Phil DiLucente, refutes these allegations, stating that the borough owes his client money instead. DiLucente emphasized Lawson's commitment to the district and community, saying, "Make no mistake, she will still be on the board."
As the Pennsylvania Department of Education steps in to audit the district's finances, the need for transparency becomes even more crucial. Board member Reed highlights this, recalling past denials of her requests for board bank statements. "Some of us are in favor of an audit to ensure everything is in order. We have too many concerns that need addressing," Reed said.
Board member Doneika Griffin emphasizes the importance of focusing on the students and the community. "I believe we need to shift our attention back to our community. If Lawson needs to resign due to her current situation, then I think she should. If we can't get this right, what message does that send to our children?" Griffin questioned.
Some parents have voiced concerns over Lawson's ability to continue voting on budgetary matters. The district's solicitor has stated that Lawson's position as president will be filled, and the board is evaluating options regarding her continued service.
This situation raises important questions about accountability, transparency, and the impact on the community and its students. What do you think? Should Lawson remain on the board despite the charges? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
