The rugby world is buzzing with a fresh twist in the Zac Lomax saga, and it’s raising eyebrows across both codes. But here’s where it gets controversial: could a star like Lomax really switch from league to union in time for next year’s World Cup? Rugby Australia CEO Phil Waugh certainly thinks so, boldly declaring, ‘Our doors are always open for world-class athletes.’ Yet, Lomax’s career is in limbo after his dramatic exit from the Parramatta Eels and the collapse of the R360 competition. His legal battle with the Eels, sparked by his attempted move to the Storm, has left fans and pundits alike scratching their heads. And this is the part most people miss: while Waugh is keen, Lomax’s lack of rugby experience could be a major hurdle—unlike Angus Crichton, who’s set to join the Wallabies in 2027 after a season with the Waratahs. Crichton, a Scots College product, has the advantage of a rugby background, making his transition smoother. But Lomax? That’s a different story. Here’s the kicker: Waugh admits, ‘We don’t know either,’ when asked about Lomax’s plans, yet he remains optimistic about the potential switch. Rugby has a history of welcoming NRL stars—think Mat Rogers, Wendell Sailor, and Lote Tuqiri—but the clock is ticking for Lomax. Former Wallabies captain John Eales warns it’s ‘difficult’ to adapt quickly, given rugby’s broader skill set. Yet, he praises Crichton’s professionalism and athleticism, qualities Lomax would need in spades. So, here’s the question: Can Lomax pull off this code switch in time, or is it a bridge too far? And does rugby’s open-door policy truly benefit the sport, or is it a risky gamble? Let’s debate this in the comments—what’s your take?
